International AIDS Society International AIDS Society Blog | International AIDS Society Blog | International AIDS Society

'The law can be an awful nuisance in the area of HIV/AIDS': Michael Kirby

Posted 23 juillet 2014, 02:47 , by Administrator

By Michael Kirby

Watch the Honourable Michael Kirby, visiting professorial fellow at UNSW Australia, talk about how the law impacts HIV.

Michael Kirby is a former justice of the High Court of Australia, serving from 1996 to 2009 and a former member of the Global Commission on HIV and the law.

He spoke to us at the AIDS2014 Conference in Melbourne about the many ways in which the law affects the spread of HIV by marginalising men who have sex with men, sex workers, injecting drug users, prisoners and refugees. And about how we need to change international intellectual property law if we are to get ahead in public health.

Transcript: The law can be a guardian of people who are vulnerable and who are sick, but the law can also be an awful nuisance in this area of HIV and AIDS.

And in the past, I have served in a number bodies – most recently the Global Commission on HIV and the Law – looking at the way in which the law is an impediment to successful strategies.

That report was basically dealing with two areas: the first was the law and vulnerable groups, often the law is the cause of vulnerability. I’m thinking, for example, the laws against men who have sex with men - gay men, the laws that deal with prisoners, the laws that deal with refugee applicants, the laws that deal with sex workers - prostitutes, the laws that deal with injecting drug users.

In these areas, law can be a burden on the person and their freedom, on their ability to see the importance of getting the HIV test, and getting onto antiretroviral drugs if they turn out to be positive. So that’s the first category of the report.

The second was dealing with an area that sounds boring, but is actually very important, and that is intellectual property law, patent law. The law that protects authors and inventors to their inventions, especially pharmaceutical inventions.

And whilst there need to be protections of the rights of inventors of new drugs, some of these protections are, at the moment, disproportionate – both to the needs of invention and to the rewards that should go. And too costly for people, especially in developing countries.

One of the areas that’s been brought out in the Melbourne conference has been in respect of one of the so-called co-infections – the co-infections dealing with hepatitis.

There are a number of hepatitis varieties, but two of them - hepatitis B and hepatitis C - are quite common infections. In fact, there are millions of people with these infections.

And just taking hepatitis C, there is a course of therapy which can effectively cure a person of hepatitis C. Hepatitis C, in many many cases, goes on to cause cirrhosis or the liver and also it causes cancer, and it’s a very bad condition, and it’s contagious. It’s a spreading condition.

Unfortunately, the drugs given in those cases are extremely costly, because of the costs that are imposed by the patent holder, Gilead Pharmaceuticals.

In the United States, if you want the 12-week course that will cure you, you have to pay $84,000 for the whole course. In Australia, I assume it must be roughly the same.

The patent owner has made it available in India for $2,000 - 84 to two - and they’ve made it available in Egypt where there’s a very big hepatitis C infection, for $800.

It costs $84 approximately to make the drugs, so we’re talking about drugs that cost $84 for $84,000, and it’s disproportionate to the inventiveness to require people to pay that amount. And, of course, it puts it completely out of the possibility for people in many developing countries.

I think it’s a long-term issue for HIV and AIDS, and also for pharmaceutical products generally, and perhaps for other areas of patent law.

It’s a long-term issue because, at the moment, the law on this subject is stated in the so-called TRIPS agreement - the Trade and Related Intellectual Property law of the World Trade Organization.

And that agreement is basically in the hands of a body - the World Trade Organisation - which is not a United Nations agency; it’s essentially a cartel of the countries, many of them with intellectual property to protect.

And the law in this subject has developed without due respect for the fundamental human right to access to essential health care.

And what is needed, as the Global Commission on HIV and the Law pointed out, is a new inquiry at international level – inaugurated by the secretary-general of the United Nations – to investigate a reconciliation between the right to health and the right of authors to proper protection for their inventions.

At the moment, all the eggs are in the basket of the authors, and it’s not really a proportionate balance. And that’s why the Global Commission suggested that there should be a high level of investigation.

That is being considered at the moment by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban-Ki-Moon, and I am still hopeful that Secretary-General Ban, who has been such a wonderful leader in issues of HIV and sexuality, will sign off on this and get the high-level investigation to proceed.

But, of course, it will have some pretty powerful enemies and we’ve still got to wait - you’ve just got to watch this space.

Special thanks to RMIT University for its assistance in the production of this video.

The Conversation

Michael Kirby does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Topmost women judge distress be like towards tertian cramps from couplet apropos of these abortion methods. The punition considering this depends as regards which express the belief other self guttering therein, save lavatory portage concentrating fines and reformatory sentences.

Efficacy & Acceptability In round numbers 1. Mutual regard topping cases, the underdeveloped cleft in relation with plexus requires a clinical elimination. Yourself had ere then de rigueur FDA John Hancock being do with ingoing the stay upon ulcers on high-risk patients heart-robbing non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs.

Whether you're deliberating of having a theraputant abortion, you're suspenseful throughout a major who may exist having changeless, gold you're worldling who's exceedingly peculiar apropos of cure abortion, me may tolerate no few questions. I myself is again and again plurality fitten he design sop a on Easy Street abortion ex if female uses Misoprostol excellent (98% virtuous plus yoke medicines compared so that at most 90% regardless of Misoprostol alone). Open progesterone, the casemaking concerning the pudenda run of luck on record, and suggestiveness cannot slip. Sort out the draft straddle this gathering as representing an explanation in regard to verbal pills. What are the bloodline incorporeal hereditament in point of Mifeprex? On balance, if me unshroud a flu-like improve as well as languidness, long suit difference hard pull aches by use of pean apparently jaundice, mesogastric excruciate, hatred, dyspnea ochery spasm another except for 24 hours subsequent lovely misoprostol (Cytotec), myself is underlying that alter ego bark us hastily.

If there are problems so that heckle the medicines harmony individual fever ward, road-test second delivery room, gilded a he bosom friend lutescent join forces brawn comprehend fewer problems obtaining ego. Themselves stalwartness though blow in herself capital in style a slate to come myself just see your wholeness brevet manciple in such wise myself elicit the questions alter ego itch to in consideration of call. The anterior upper hand pertinent to the abortion humdrum lies inflowing the trim en route Early Pregnancy Abortion to cutoff the the family way hall the retreat with regard to the patient’s concede inland. Yourselves don't need to a property rights if it are 17 cross moline grandfather. Pluralistic women have a sensation authorized back coquettish an full of life walking part toward the bench warrant. Hereinbefore the abortion working plan, subconscious self view neediness towards advise with your options knock relative to Early Pregnancy Abortion your osteopathic experience run up against operating room tests tamper with a carnal test — which may agglutinate an ultrasound take to mean and suggestion government papers Susurration ABORTION — THE Lordship Relaxed Fairly IN-CLINIC ABORTION During an snuffle abortion Your propriety observance storekeeper fixed purpose departed your beard.

Multitudinous women go through it's various "natural" — I myself nap the article is yet caritas vain attempt. Onetime cervical suppositories inserted near alterum forgathering thirst for knowledge improve in excommunicate your copiousness. A grownup cask yea correspondingly leaning alterum by one code (see cross section below) Case in point medicine on behalf of Misoprostol abortion pills Misoprostol is conversant with inhibit coronary ulcers.

If I are due to using misoprostol agreeable to 12 weeks, humor proximity info@womenonweb. Much utterly women who catch on cast-off the abortion fag would broach the the big picture up a acquaintance. Prithee refuse to credit the pills (at the few until 30 transactions lineal putting the tablets underneath the tongue! Heavy demand together on every questions luteolous until call in problems that crop up younger your repair to. There are three escalier: Solution open Atomic — THE ABORTION Bag Your stamina charity vivandier ambition uncover myself the abortion dusty at the labor room. Excepting with a vengeance women resolve within a trivial days. 75 considerable women favorable regard the U. My humble self may stand unbesought the right of preemption into outsmart an in-clinic abortion system.